Okay. This is serious. I don’t know if anyone’s going to bother reading this and reblogging it, but it needs to be said. I hate the words “retarded” “retard” “spaz” “spastic” and other variants on the theme. The reason I hate those words is because I have a mild form of Cerebral Palsy, which is what most people think of as “retarded” or “spastic”. Fortunately for me, the CP doesn’t affect my cognitive abilities, only my movements and occasionally my grasp on human social interaction. The only time I find the words “spastic” or “retarded” acceptable is when it is being used in the context of neurological specialists— they are the only people, in my view, allowed to use those words in a non-offensive, non-triggering way. The medical field need these phrases, the rest of the world does not.
The reason I’m going on this self-righteous crusade is because people need to learn to think before they make graphics where the phrase: “dance with your pants on your head retarded” features prominently. According to urban dictionary, the phrase seems to stem from the preconceived notion that anyone with any form of disability is somehow mentally unable to determine that pants don’t go on their head. This is a fallacy that needs to change.
Sure, there are some disabilities where the intellectual part of the disability is just as terrible as the physical side, but it doesn’t excuse the social misconception that disability means they’re somehow incapable of deciding where to put their pants. But the pants thing is not the point. There needs to be a serious change in how people perceive disability, regardless of whether it’s Downs’ Syndrome, Cerebral Palsy, Williams’ Syndrome, Angelman’s Syndrome, etc. I have spent enough time among the disabled to know that while some people may have very low cognitive abilities, they are still people.
I suppose that for me, the words retarded and spastic are like calling someone of African descent a “nigger” when you’re a Caucasian. It’s the same type of elitism, the same type of hair-trigger reaction. If you think that I’m just being overly-sensitive, I can tell you that I’m not. When you have been teased as a child for being disabled, you might have a different reaction—- you may feel as I do, that it is unfair that the words have become so pervasive in society.
So, if someone can crusade against child soldiers in Uganda, I can crusade against these two words, regardless of whether I’m the lone voice in the wilderness calling. I urge people to stop and think for a moment the next time they unthinkingly use the word. I urge people to think about what it’s like to have a disability which is so misrepresented by society, by the internet, and by the world. Yes, this is something so pervasive, so commonplace and mundane, so terribly unthinking, and you know that words hurt.
The old lie about sticks and stones? Yeah, that’s a lie. Words and actions do hurt. I call on everyone to take a moment to think what it would be like if a six year old child, already alienated because they have hearing aids, got teased for always looking like she was about to fall over, for not grasping the subtle nuances that her peers already get, who gets teased with two hands crossed over and shaking and the facial expression on her tormentor’s faces being one of cruel mockery. That six year old child was me.
I fought back, giving as good as I got. But still, the attitude desperately needs to change.
